Fri Aug, 15 2008
"Problem Jurors"
Judge Young writes, “The impropriety of [jury] nullification emanates from the notion that ours is ‘a government of laws and not of men,’”...as if the laws are not of men.
...as if there is some ethical and political magic that happens when some men establish "laws" that dominate other peoples' lives.
Consider the absurdity, ladies and gentlemen, of a person being appointed to a jury and charged with the responsibility and authority of judging a given case without the authority to bring his whole mind to bear on everything involved in the case, to include the law. To prohibit that final aspect is to arbitrarily demand blind obedience, not to this floating abstraction of "the law", but to some individuals' assertion of everyone else's political relationship to their particular ethics, now enforced by government.
What Federal District Court Judge William Young really wants is for jurors in his court to stop thinking when he tells them to.
Can you understand how dangerous this is?
The problem is not with jurors.
Tim Lynch noted this matter.




