Tue Jun, 27 2006
Propagating Dis-reason
Go have a look at my comment, here. It's the very first one.
Then, pay close attention to the comment immediately following mine.
What on earth could possibly be the value in pandering to assertions of non-essentials as essentials?
Do you understand? I don't know how to put it more plainly. What would drive an intelligent man to calling a thing what it isn't, and consciously avoiding what it is? This is just horribly corrosive to thought, itself and in general, nevermind productive intercourse of ideas, and the reason I'm given boils down to nothing more than that everyone else is doing it.
I don't know about anyone else, but I have no place in my intellectual workspace to put something like that. There simply is no possibility -- none -- of reason at that point. All bets are off, and anything goes.
"Random images. No order."
Whether you believe it or not, ladies and gentlemen, that's the death-knell of a culture like this one, far into its throes already. And you might not believe that, but then you won't believe this, either: you, reading this, right now, were almost certainly never trained to distill anything to essentials. There isn't one in a thousand of you out there.
I don't know what can possibly be done about it before the necessary implications take their place in reality.




